| SunTrust
Banks, Inc. Partners with CheckWorks, Inc. to Deliver
Check Images to the Back Office Desktop |
| |
| Quick
Facts about SunTrust (as of October 2003) |
| Asset
Size: |
$126.7
Billion |
| Total
Deposits: |
$80.5
Billion |
| Number
of offices: |
1,200 |
| Number
of employees: |
27,650 |
|
|
| |
| SunTrust
Bank, the ninth largest commercial banking organization
in the United States, has successfully proliferated image
technology throughout its entire organization. In particular,
it has revolutionized the world of back office work management.
The bank’s strategic vision of delivering image
to every desktop, coupled with the solutions and expertise
of CheckWorks, Inc., a leading image management solutions
company based in Alpharetta, Georgia, brought the vision
into reality. |
| |
| CheckWorks
and SunTrust |
|
SunTrust first partnered with CheckWorks, Inc. in 1998,
to provide image management, retrieval and delivery
technology to the back office of Item Processing, and
in particular, to General Ledger Reconcilement, Proof,
Balancing, Exceptions, Returns, and Research. In 1998-99,
CheckWorks developed ImageExplorer/Network,
an image retrieval, distribution and management solution,
that was first installed in the SunTrust Operations
Center in Orlando, Florida. This suite, made up of various
image utilities, a Java® viewer and a host manager,
enabled SunTrust to deliver images to the back office
PC workstations and to quickly resolve Reconcilement,
Exceptions and Large Single-Item Deposit issues. |
| |
| Through
ImageExplorer/Network,
back office personnel could view work-specific images
at the desktop, immediately after capture. The List Feature
enabled Proof personnel to view a sequential list of images
in their capture order, with the corresponding image displayed
for each item on the list. This was a far cry from the
world of General Ledger Reconcilement prior to image,
when two or three trays of physical items were delivered
to Special Handling, and had to be reviewed and verified
by hand. After making changes, those items then had to
be sent back through for re-handling. |
| |
| The
CheckWorks solution was expanded to support SunTrust at
each progressive stage of image enablement, growing with
the organization’s bank-wide and department-wide
strategy. The Image Copy utility allowed images saved
in one regional Check
Image Management System (CIMS) database to be copied
and stored in another region’s CIMS. This removed
the need to recapture physical items between regions to
support various local operations. Further, CheckWorks
developed the Image
Import utility, which imported images captured after
Reject Repair, into the same CIMS archive that stored
the prime capture images.
ImageExplorer/Network
had a profound impact on SunTrust’s capture methods.
The entire second capture for image re-handled items
was eliminated since each item had already been captured
after the prime capture pass.
Reconcilement personnel were relieved of the long hours
spent searching for physical items or microfilmed images
to complete their work. Part of the success of ImageExplorer/Network
involved retrieval programs developed by SunTrust that
automatically identified and loaded images from the
All Items file into ImageExplorer/Network,
specific to the work being performed by Reconcilement.
This automated retrieval program was also utilized by
Large Single-Item Deposits, Reject Repair and Exceptions
Non-Post. |
 |
| |
| SunTrust’s
Image Enablement Strategy |
| SunTrust’s
road to image-enablement has been well thought out and
deliberate. Through various acquisitions, the bank had
check capture sites located in five states. Retrieval
processes and technology were not uniform among the regions.
Some areas, such as Florida, were already equipped with
image cameras on all of the IBM 3890 reader/sorters. Other
regions had some image capture, but the image archives
were not accessible to the rest of the organization.
As has been the case with most financial institutions,
the cost of image archives has been cost prohibitive,
in terms of using them on a large scale. For several
years, SunTrust stored its images temporarily in local
CIMS (Check Image Management
System) and CheckVision® archives. In the back
office, these short term archives were more than adequate
for time-sensitive operations such as General Ledger
Reconcilement, Exceptions and Reject Repair.
As the organization as a whole saw the potential for
an image-enabled enterprise, cameras were installed
on the IBM 3890s at all of the capture sites. Simultaneously,
archive costs came down, and SunTrust explored a relationship
with Viewpointe Archive Services.
These departments, that once required physical items
or photocopies of microfilm images, are now able to
retrieve these same images at the desktop. This is a
far cry from the old days of searching through trays
of physical items, losing precious time in the process.
Today’s solution has reduced once time-consuming,
labor-intensive daily processes to a couple of hours’
work.
|
 |
| |
| SunTrust
and Viewpointe Archive Services |
SunTrust
partnered with Viewpointe Archive Services, where it now
stores its check images. Today, CheckWorks’ ImageExplorer/Enterprise,
branded as SunTrust’s ImageLink, supports 17,000
users throughout the bank, 1,000 of whom are in the back
office. SunTrust went live with Viewpointe Archive Services
and CheckWorks’ ImageExplorer/Enterprise
in July 2003. Since, the entire organization has become
image enabled. As the archive reaches its six months of
history, departments requiring aged retrievals are beginning
to experience the full benefit.
|
| |
| Impact
of the Bank's Reorganization |
| SunTrust’s
image strategy was incorporated into a larger plan for
departmental and regional consolidations, as the bank
worked to both streamline existing processes and eliminate
duplication of effort. Soon after the implementation of
ImageExplorer/Network,
all of the Reconcilement functions for SunTrust were consolidated
in Miami, and Exceptions Non-Post were consolidated in
Orlando. Large deposit items continue to be reviewed regionally.
Each region captures items on their sorters, then transmits
them via channel-attached devices to the internal CIMS
archive. |
 |
| |
|
| |
| Success
Stories |
| The
following stories describe the impact of image enablement
on General Ledger Reconcilement, Large Single-Item Deposits
(Special Handling) and Exceptions Non-Post. |
| |
| General
Ledger Reconcilement |
Each morning, the Reconcilement department must balance
the bank’s internal, or General Ledger, accounts.
This work has to be reviewed, verified and corrected
early and quickly, to ensure that out-of-balance conditions,
including teller over and shorts, as well as suspect
transactions are identified.
Prior to image, General Ledger tickets were sorted
each day and the physical items were provided to the
Reconcilement area. When CheckWorks’ ImageExplorer/Network
was installed, the shipping of physical G/L tickets
came to a halt. Additionally, errors were reduced to
a fraction from what they had been when back office
personnel had to perform daily manual reconcilement
and balancing of internal accounts, the Fed account
and "due from" bank statements.
Finally, the amount of time and the number of employees
it had once taken to perform these functions by noon
each day decreased from three shifts down to just one. |
 |
| |
| Large
Single-Item Deposits |
CheckWorks’ ImageExplorer/Network,
and now ImageExplorer/Enterprise,
has been implemented successfully in the Special Handling
Department in the Proof area, where large-deposit item
verification is performed. These deposits of $10,000
or more are made up of one check and one deposit slip.
Special Handling reviews each of these items early in
the day to catch encoding errors, thus preventing any
exposure on the part of the bank, or any inconvenience
to customers.
Special Handling needed a way to view images of these
large single-item deposits on a screen, rather than
having to hunt down the physical items that could have
found their way into Reject Repair or Exceptions. SunTrust
developed filter programs that went against the All
Items database and sorted out the images for large,
single-item deposits. These images were then broken
into groups of items, making it possible to share work.
The efforts of the Special Handling group were transformed
by CheckWorks’ ImageExplorer/Network,
from a highly time-consuming and manual process, to
one in which large-dollar deposits could be reviewed
systematically on a screen, with a summary list of items
on the left, and the corresponding images displayed
on the right. The CheckWorks Java™ viewer provided
various image manipulation features, including zoom,
brightness and grayscale controls.
Employees are now able to sit at their desks and review
items, with a much higher success rate in catching problematic
transactions. Since these items have been captured as
images, they no longer have to be re-processed. Job
quality and satisfaction have increased, and work can
be shared and distributed quickly and easily. |
 |
| |
| Exceptions
Non-Post |
| Non-posted
exception items are checks that, for various reasons,
did not post the previous night. As a result, back office
personnel must examine each item to determine the reason,
and then re-qualify and run those items again. In the
same way that the Large Single-Item Deposit group first
had to locate the physical items, Exceptions Non-Post
was also looking for a way to view their specific images
in a list. By using CheckWorks’
ImageExplorer/Network, department personnel were able
to view the non-post exception item images on a screen
each morning, listed in their capture sequence order.
No longer were they burdened with viewing one physical
item at a time, which drastically reduced the amount of
time required to process those items. |
| |
| This
case study addresses Back Office operations specifically;
see our other CheckWorks case studies for information
on how image was extended to the branches, Research,
and to bank-client applications such as Internet
Banking and Treasury Management. |
|
|
| |
|